Trying to configure Vhost on Ubuntu Server but not going well.

I can configure one site and everything work well,

as soon as I configure second site not able to access any site

 

 

using xxx.xx.4.10/firstsite

OR

xxx.xx.4.10/secondsite

 

So when configuring Vhost what should be done?

i.e

what changes should be done

/etc/apache2/sites-available/default

/etc/apache2/sites-available/www.firstsite.com

/etc/apache2/sites-available/www.second.com

 

OR SHOULD I be changing

 

etc/apache2/apache.conf

 

 

 

Here are my configuration where should I change

(I have just change the first part and the rest left it as default)

 

sudo nano /etc/apache2/sites-available/default

NameVirtualHost *:80

<VirtualHost *:80>

ServerAdmin webmaster@localhost

 

DocumentRoot /var/www/firstsite

ServerName www.firstsite.com

ServerAlias firstsite.com

#Second site

</Virtualhost>

<VirtualHost *:80>

DocumentRoot /var/www/secondsite

ServerName www.secondsite.com

ServerAlias secondsite.com

<Directory />

Options FollowSymLinks

AllowOverride None

</Directory>

<Directory /var/www/>

Options Indexes FollowSymLinks MultiViews

AllowOverride None

 

 

***********

sudo nano /etc/apache2/sites-available/www.firstsite.com

NameVirtualHost *:80

<VirtualHost *:80>

ServerAdmin webmaster@localhost

 

DocumentRoot /var/www/firstsite

ServerName www.firstsite.com

ServerAlias firstsite.com

 

<Directory />

Options FollowSymLinks

AllowOverride None

</Directory>

<Directory /var/www/>

 

 

 

Options Indexes FollowSymLinks MultiViews

AllowOverride None

Order allow,deny

allow from all

</Directory>

 

**********

sudo nano /etc/apache2/sites-available/www.second.com

NameVirtualHost *:80

<VirtualHost *:80>

ServerAdmin webmaster@localhost

 

DocumentRoot /var/www/secondsite

ServerName www.secondsite.com

ServerAlias secondsite.com

<Directory />

Options FollowSymLinks

AllowOverride None

</Directory>

<Directory /var/www/>

Options Indexes FollowSymLinks MultiViews

AllowOverride None

Order allow,deny

allow from all

</Directory>

****

/etc/apache2/sites-available# ls -l

total 12

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1236 2008-08-05 09:32 default

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1091 2008-08-05 09:28 www.firstsite.com

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1080 2008-08-05 09:34 www.secondsite.com

 

 

Reloading apache I got the following error

 

 

# sudo /etc/init.d/apache2 reload

* Reloading web server config apache2

apache2: Could not reliably determine the server's fully qualified domain nam

using xxx.xxxx.xxx.10 for ServerName

[Tue Aug 05 09:57:01 2008] [warn] NameVirtualHost *:80 has no VirtualHosts

[Tue Aug 05 09:57:01 2008] [warn] NameVirtualHost *:80 has no VirtualHosts

[Tue Aug 05 09:57:01 2008] [warn] NameVirtualHost *:80 has no VirtualHosts

Quote:schliz alerts us to a story out of the UK PC distribution channel. It seems that the percentage of systems pre-installed with Linux has gone up 28 times since Vista shipped, from 0.1% in January 2007 to 2.8% last June. Still not huge numbers, but Apple did OK for years with similar market share figures. Linux's headway comes in the face of the marketing money that manufacturers pass out to distributors, money that has historically been important to their profits: "In the late 1990s competition was so keen that distributors were said to sell at or below cost and take their profit direct from the marketing funds they received from vendors. Vendors nowadays keep watch to see their marketing funds are actually spent on marketing, but distribution runs on single figure profits and vendor marketing funds are a crucial aid."

-------------

RESOLVED

-------------

Hi. I running on Debian 4, installed the openssh-server /w the blacklist & rssh & molly-guard using Synaptic Package Manager, but can't connect using PuTTY from my Vista box. Could somebody show me what I need to enable in the config files (see below) to get it to work? Thanx.

 

The story so far...

I've read the man pages, which seem pretty daunting at this point, and been trawling the net, where I've found lots of juicy tidbits, but nothing that walks me thru it line by line. It's not PuTTY cause I had it working last nite when I did a commandline install using "apt-get install ssh", but I also got some sort of legacy message. As I've done a reinstall since then, I thought I'd try and avoid the legacy issue and use Synaptic. From what I have found on the net, all the needed files "seem" to be in the right place, but it looks like there's a bunch of stuff that is commented out that shouldn't be (I think...)

 

For those of us now running the KDE 4.0 series, there is a Firefox 3.0 theme being developed to foster better visual integration between KDE 4 and Firefox.

 

The theme uses the Oxygen icon set and also includes other visual tweaks to best match the visual style of KDE 4.

 



 

It's at an early stage right now, so use with caution. The link you'll want is:

 

http://ramonantonio.net/kde-firefox/

Hi. So I'm doing an install on a box that's only got 128MB memory (which i know is below the recommended amount) :)

Everything is fine until I reboot, at which point I am shuttled directly to the login prompt ...cause there ain't enough memory to run in graphics mode(?).

Is there a way to finish the installation in textmode. Has anybody written a How-To if it's possible?

 

I don't particularly need graphics mode cause its just a personal webserver project. I wanna do a xampp/eGroupware install. Doesnt matter how slow it is. And seeing as I miss having a commandline, I'd rather learn the text mode commands and switches anyways. :)

Hi! I'm new to Linux ... ... well I've still have yet to use it, but i am interested. I have been using windows my entire life and it'd like to try something else.

 

i use computers for gaming and I'm pretty familiar with hardware and drivers but other software and coding I'm unexperienced with. I'm going to be building a computer within the next year or so because my computer that i built 2 years ago is beginning to show its age and it'd like to get a feel before making the switch over to Linux.

 

I've briefed some sites about compatibility with many programs and this is another hurdle I'm going to have to learn to get around. if there is any videos/walkthroughs or any other form of help it would be greatly appreciate!

 

and if you do any online gaming yourself, i might play/played it before too.

I've been looking to try out linux for a while, and was going to install Fedora until I took a look at Gentoo. I know it's not very user-friendly, but i have looked at the handbook on the website and I'm willing to spend a lot of time reading/learning about it. The reason I want to use Gentoo is because I think I would learn a lot from using it.

 

What are your thoughts? Would it be too much of a leap for me to start using Gentoo right away and should I just use Fedora? Thank you for your time and help. :)

Quote:6 months after the release of KDE 4.0, the KDE community today announced the released of the second feature release in the KDE 4 era. Lots of changes have gone into this release and the KDE community hopes to be able to make most early-adopting users happy with this release. Lots of feedback from people trying out KDE 4.0 has gone into KDE 4.1, filling most of the gaps people experienced with the 4.0 releases. Highlights of KDE 4.1 are the KDE PIM suite, which has returned in its KDE 4 incarnation, a more mature Plasma desktop and many, many new features and applications. Make sure to take some time to read through the high-level changelog or even the more detailed feature plan on Techbase. Before you try KDE 4.1, please read the KDE4 End User FAQ and make an educated guess whether KDE 4.1 is for you.

How do I convert a bootable CD/DVD (i.e., the disks that come with various linux magazines) into a bootable USBkey -- to install on a laptop that does not have an optical drive?

Someone else set this computer up for me some time ago, but I had a secondary hard drive mounted that worked fine just yesterday, and has decided to permanently unmount itself. Worse, I had a lot of stuff on it that I would be crushed to lose!

 

So today I tried to download something to it, and at first it appeared normal, went through the directories no problem. But for some reason Firefox's download window didn't come up, and when I tried to go look at the file in the folder, suddenly the folder wouldn't load. The rest of the drive loaded, just that one folder wouldn't come up. Then later on the whole drive seemed to be empty. I'm really sure the file wasn't the problem, as not only do I trust the source, but I later downloaded it to my main hard drive, so I wouldn't be here now if it was an evil hard-drive killing file.

 

I did what every noob does--tried rebooting. Maybe it'll sort itself out, right? Well, it started off the boot with a message that it couldn't mount that hard drive, and offered F1 for continue, and F2 for setup. I chose setup initially, but I didn't know what, if anything, I should change, so I let it be. It now boots without mounting this drive.

 

I tried to run FSCK on it, but it doesn't seem like FSCK can find it. If I've even got the right place. The mount point seems to refer to /mnt/hdd, and that seems to refer to /dev/hdd1, but this....does not exist?

 

I suspect my main hard drive may actually be the corrupt one, as sometimes files seem to unexpectedly break or get lost. Could it be that some file involved in mounting this drive just up and vanished? How do I find out if this is so or not, and if it is, how do I replace/repair it? If I'm completely off base (wouldn't be the first time!) what do I do now? Are my files salvageable? In a word, help!

 

(btw, I am running Gentoo. It seemed like a good idea back when I had someone who liked me enough to fix things for me. >.>)